The Potentially High Costs of Pest Control | HOME IMPROVEMENT

Members of the insecticide industry are up in arms because of new regulations handed down by the American government that might mean an additional $145 billion in expenses for consumers wanting to combat the powder post beetle. Arguing that less expensive methods can be substituted to save money, the Environmental Protection Agency cited industry figures to support their disputing such a claim. Workers in the pest control business stand by their claim that since certain products have been banned for use it has become increasingly costly to get rid of the powder post beetles and some other common household pests. He compared the insect to a termite and said that it infests as many as 140,000 homes in the country every year. In addition, he has stated that this banned pesticide could be used when the beetles come into the house, and by applying the pesticide in the needed areas, this guarantees that the household is beetle-free for one year. He says the chemical was always safe and it was extremely effective, but it has now been removed from the market so the only available choice now is fumigation. In other words, residents have to leave their households while it contains that pesticide. The cost for fumigation is much higher, costing the homeowner anywhere from $1,000 to $2,000, far more that the cost for the standard chemical spray. The EPA does not see things this way though, noting that the chemical industry has highlighted several possible alternative to the previous product which should be similarly effective and cost about the same. He has also stated that the powder post beetle presents only visual issues without bringing about any structural harm, unlike termites. Known as pentachlorophenol, this chemical does turn out to be almost identical in regards to the price of the banned chemical; this replacement utilized to control the powder post beetle was approved by the EPA and is efficient. For this reason, the EPA predicts no increase in the general cost of maintaining home pest control. As the EPA spokesman pointed out, this analysis was based on the testimony given by the pest control association as well as the producer of the now banned pesticide. At EPA hearings regarding whether or not they should put a temporary moratorium on the chemical or ban it permanently, this testimony was offered. Many pest control experts are still claiming that millions of uinnecessary dollars are going to be charged to consumers looking to rid their homes of these beetles. With no satisfaction in claiming to a couple now in their 70?s that their home has been infested and that he can only offer them the efficient and legal treatment which will require them to pay more than $1,000, an owner of a pest control company claimed that he had employed this banned chemical safely for more than 30 years. The EPA made their decision founded on incomplete data, he further claimed. He finally went so far as to say that the verdict was a huge error, but the EPA still has not overturned their decision and the trial may continue for several more years.

Source: http://www.shanyou-stone.com/the-potentially-high-costs-of-pest-control.htm

julia gillard julia gillard paul ryan kevin federline t mobile twilight rush limbaugh